Assignment+2

[|Coolest Marketer In America Michael Taggart][|Turn ads off - $5/month] edit SaveCancel || Below is an excerpt from Andrew Ure, a British industrialist who makes his case for "progress." After reading it, go to the "Discussions" tab.
 * ~ Details || last edit [|Feb 27, 2009 2:56 pm] by [[image:http://c1.wikicdn.com/i/user_none_sm.jpg width="16" height="16" caption="bcalsbeek" link="http://www.wikispaces.com/user/view/bcalsbeek"]] [|bcalsbeek] - [|6 revisions] - [|locked] ||> [[image:http://c1.wikicdn.com/i/w/W_close.gif caption="hide details"]] ||
 * ~ Tags || * none


 * First: Weigh the merits of his argument. Your opinion must be in response to specific details from the text; In other words, don't just make generalizations.....**


 * Next: Define progress. What are the indicators of progress in a society (for example, average income, disparity of wealth, education rates, etc). Explain your position.**


 * Finally: Respond to a classmate's view of progress.**

When the first water-frames for spinning cotton were erected at Cromford, in the romantic valley of the Derwent, about sixty years ago, mankind were little aware of the mighty revolution which the new system of labour was destined by Providence to achieve, not only in the structure of British society, but in the fortunes of the world at large. Arkwright alone had the sagacity to discern, and the boldness to predict in glowing language, how vastly productive human industry would become, when no longer proportioned in its results to muscular effort, which is by its nature fitful and capricious, but when made to consist in the task of guiding the work of mechanical fingers and arms, regularly impelled with great velocity by some indefatigable physical power. What his judgment so clearly led him to perceive, his energy of will enabled him to realize with such rapidity and success, as would have done honour to the most influential individuals, but were truly wonderful in that obscure and indigent artisan.... The principle of the factory system then is, to substitute mechanical science for hand skill, and the partition of a process into its essential constituents, for the division or graduation of labour among artisans. On the handicraft plan, labour more or less skilled was usually the most expensive element of production.... but on the automatic plan, skilled labour gets progressively superseded, and will, eventually, be replaced by mere overlookers of machines..... The grand object therefore of the modern manufacturer is, through the union of capital and science, to reduce the task of his work-people to the exercise of vigilance and dexterity, - faculties, when concentred to one process, speedily brought to perfection in the young. In the infancy of mechanical engineering, a machine-factory displayed the division of labour in manifold gradations - the file, the drill, the lathe, having each its different workmen in the order of skill: but the dextrous hands of the filer and driller are now superseded by the planing, the key groove cutting, and the drilling-machines; and those of the iron and brass turners, by the self-acting slide-lathe.... It is, in fact, the constant aim and tendency of every improvement in machinery to supersede human labour altogether, or to diminish its cost, by substituting the industry of women and children for that of men; or that of ordinary labourers for trained artisans. In most of the water-twist, or throstle cotton-mills, the spinning is entirely managed by females of sixteen years and upwards. The effect of substituting the self-acting mule for the common mule, is to discharge the greater part of the men spinners, and to retain adolescents and children. The proprietor of a factory near Stockport states, in evidence to the commissioners, that, by such substitution, he would save 501. a week in wages in consequence of dispensing with nearly forty male spinners, at about 25s. of wages each.... Type in the content of your page here.